I saw the details for this Read Along
on the Little Red Reviewers blog, here, though I know that several other blogs are
involved as well. I thought it looked like fun and signed up to make posts on
my blog every week.
You can see Redhead’s Part 1 post here.
If you haven't read the book, or even if you have, why not join in and read along with the rest of us?
This week we have read the Prologue and
up to the end of the Interlude: Locke Stays For Dinner, which ends on p. 97 of
my kindle edition.
1.
If this is your first time reading The Lies of Locke Lamora, what do you think
of it so far? If this is a re-read for you, how does the book stand up to
rereading?
I had never heard of the title, or it’s
author, before I saw the post about the Read Along, but I am a fan of fantasy
and any series with the title “The Gentlemen Bastard” is going to catch my eye.
So far I have found this a very entertaining read, with plenty of humor and
texture. The characters are gritty and often very ‘direct’ in their use of language,
so this is no fairy tale with fluffy bunnies and coy princesses: excellent! I
am going to find it difficult to restrict my reading to the proscribed pages
over the next few weeks.
2.
At last count, I found three time lines: Locke as a 20-something adult,
Locke meeting Father Chains for the first time, and Locke as a younger child in
Shades Hill. How are you doing with the Flashback within a flashback style of
introducing characters and the world?
Obviously it is difficult to decide if
this is the best way for the author to proceed, but it does have the massive
advantage of keeping Locke mysterious. We are seeing the present and past
versions of him, so we can contrast the brilliant but impulsive child with the
polished final item that he has become. It also has the feel of a scam: as we
uncover one layer of ‘truth’ another one is revealed underneath. It will be
interesting to see what other ‘mistakes’ the young Locke makes during his
training.
3.
Speaking of the world, what do you think of Camorr and Lynch’s world building?
I like how he slips unusual aspects of
the world into the story telling in a subtle way, often with no explanation at all. I haven’t felt bogged down by
tons of exposition, though some of the differences between Camorr and our world
are quite intriguing.
4.
Father Chains and the death offering. . . quite the code of honor for
thieves, isn’t it? What kind of person do you think Chains is going to mold
Locke into?
I found this quite touching and
unexpected for thieves. Of course, that is assuming that it is the truth. If it is, then it shows how the thieves remember their own sad beginnings and try to pay back the care and training that they received as youngsters. However, it might all be a bluff by Father Chains to
teach Locke the value of being careful: I wouldn’t trust Chains as far as I
could spit him.
5.
It’s been a while since I read this, and I’d forgotten how much of the
beginning of the book is pure set up, for the characters, the plot, and the
world. Generally speaking, do you prefer set up and world building done
this way, or do you prefer to be thrown into the deep end with what’s
happening?
As I said above, I haven't felt weighed down by the set up, so I feel as if there is a good balance of
the two approaches here. It can be very difficult to really follow a story if
you don’t have time to become acclimated to the new environment. However, it
can be very tedious to spend the first fifty pages on an intricate description
of the world with mind-blowing amounts of detail.
6.
If you’ve already started attempting to pick the pockets of your family members
(or even thought about it!) raise your hand.
As someone who has had people repeatedly try to
lighten my purse whilst in Rome, Italy, I would never dream of doing this! :D