You can find links to other blogs taking part here.
When I first saw this as the discussion topic, my heart sank because I had this image of Classic Literature as the very worthy but immensely difficult and dull things that I was forced to read at school. However, in an attempt to find some inspiration, I turned to the indispensible book resource that is Goodreads, where I found this rather more appealing description of what makes a title a ‘classic’:
When I first saw this as the discussion topic, my heart sank because I had this image of Classic Literature as the very worthy but immensely difficult and dull things that I was forced to read at school. However, in an attempt to find some inspiration, I turned to the indispensible book resource that is Goodreads, where I found this rather more appealing description of what makes a title a ‘classic’:
A classic stands the test of time. The work is usually considered to be a representation of the period in which it was written; and the work merits lasting recognition. In other words, if the book was published in the recent past, the work is not a classic. A classic has a certain universal appeal. Great works of literature touch us to our very core beings--partly because they integrate themes that are understood by readers from a wide range of backgrounds and levels of experience. Themes of love, hate, death, life, and faith touch upon some of our most basic emotional responses.
There was also an extensive list of books
considered to be Popular
Classics, so I discovered that I had actually enjoyed reading far more
Classic titles than I had originally thought. In order to keep this post to a reasonable
length it soon became obvious that I could only list authors and not the
various works that they had written. I then thought that I could select my top
ten, but looking through the first ten pages of the list showed me that it
would be an impossible task to narrow the list down even that far!
The Most Daunting Authors
Some of the oldest authors are the most daunting to approach, and yet
their works are the foundation of much of the literature that has followed
them. Their stories are so familiar that they have become embedded in our
culture and are well known even to those who have never actually read their
works. Some of them need to be read in translation because they were written in
an ancient language or because the form of English used is so old that we
struggle to understand it.
Of the ancient storytellers, I can highly recommend many of the Greek
playwrights, such as Aeschylus, Euripides and Sophocles. Although their plays
use many conventions that we find strange, such as a Chorus, their retelling of
Greek mythology is fascinating and terrifying as it explores the tragic
violence of human nature. Many of the plays may be best appreciated in
adaptation, rather than literal translations, so that the story shines through
the unfamiliar technicalities. This is also true for the father of all epic fiction, Homer. He and his
Roman equivalent, Virgil, were master craftsmen, but their work is so detailed
and alien that it can defeat the casual reader. However, the stories they
relate are wonderfully familiar and inventive, weaving history and mythology
into an intriguing mixture.
Perhaps the most daunting author that many of us have been forced to
attempt at school is the one that we could gain the most from reading again and
again: William Shakespeare. Possibly the greatest writer of the English
language to have ever put pen to paper, he is an integral part of modern
culture and should be revisited whenever possible, if only to see where so many
of our idioms and sayings come from. It is very unfortunate that so many of us
are tortured with his works at school and then become convinced that they
incomprehensible rubbish. He is definitely a writer who benefits from adaptation, even it is through the simple act of producing his work on stage. There are many excellent filmed versions of his works as well, such as Kenneth Branagh's Henry V and Ian McKellen's Richard III.
I would also place Charles Dickens into this category, even though he
writes in much more modern English. His writing is so incredibly dense that it
can be hard work to slog through it at first and he is another author that is
done a disservice by the enthusiastic English teachers who try to force our
youthful minds to stagger through his epic descriptions. It must be remembered
that many of his works were published in serial form, so that the original
readers had a week, or even a month, to absorb each installment before
attempting the next. As with Shakespeare, his characters and stories are
wonderful and he remains the greatest novelist of the Victorian era. As with The Bard, there are some excellent filmed adaptations available, such as David Lean's Oliver Twist.
Rip-Roaring Adventures
There are some writers who write a terrific yarn that will carry you
along as the plot unfolds. This does not mean that they do not create memorable
characters or comment on the world around them, but that they are less gritty
than some other authors and will provide you with pure entertainment.
For joyful, unrelenting adventure and marvelous voyages of discovery I
would recommend Jules Verne and Robert Louis Stevenson and if you like a little
political intrigue thrown in, then Alexandre Dumas is a great choice. If you
prefer something a little more cerebral, then how about the greatest intellect
ever to grace the fictional page: Sherlock Holmes? Although he is not the only
creation of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, he is most certainly the most famous and
possibly one of the most beloved characters ever created. Of course, he has
stiff competition in the form of Agatha Christie’s Hercule Poirot and she is
not the best selling novelist of all time by accident. She is outsold only
by Shakespeare and the Bible and is the most translated author, with copies of
her works in at least 103 separate languages. If you like to exercise your
‘little grey cells’, then she has a wide range of titles to offer.
Children’s Writers
Many children’s authors remain our favorites throughout our lives simply
because their works conjure images of our own childhood, but others create
worlds that work equally well for adult readers as well, and these become
timeless classics.
Two authors that had a profound effect on me as a child were Anna Sewell
and Richard Adams. Anna Sewell’s only work was Black Beauty, the story of a
horse as it moves through the hands of a variety of owners: some good, some bad.
It highlights the terrible mistreatment that many animals suffered during the
Victorian era and is very moving. Richard Adams published several works, but
the best known is Watership Down, which remains one of my most favorite books
of all time. It follows the journey of a group of young rabbits from their
doomed warren to the idyllic destination of Watership Down. They struggle
through many setbacks and encounter various other rabbit society structures
before arriving at their destination. It is a work of great imagination, which
creates a unique mythology for the rabbits, along with their own language and
even folklore.
Other children’s authors who stand the test of time are Lewis Carroll,
C.S. Lewis, A.A. Milne and Kenneth Grahame. Their worlds and characters are
world famous and rightly so. We can now add more modern authors to this list,
with Roald Dahl and J.K. Rowling being ever popular amongst both children and
their elders.
The Greats of Speculative
Fiction
Finally, I want to mention a few of the great authors that write my most
preferred genre: Speculative Fiction. The earliest of these is Mary Shelley,
who almost single-handedly created the genre of Science Fiction with her novel,
Frankenstein. However, there are other innovators, such as Bram Stoker, who
changed the novel into a much more recognizably modern form. As well as Jules
Verne, who I have already mentioned, there is also H.G. Wells, whose work is
much darker and less optimistic in tone. Although Wells’ visions are terrifying
and disturbing, they also speak to the triumph of the human spirit.
More recent authors have expanded upon these early works and taken us
into much darker worlds, like those of George Orwell. They have also sought to
understand the human condition within a political context, as we see in Frank
Herbert’s Dune series. They have even shown us how totally absurd the universe
might be, and how we humans are ‘mostly harmless’, as in Douglas Adams’ gloriously
crazy Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy series.
Of course, no list of classic novels would be complete without the
father of modern fantasy: J.R.R. Tolkien. It was no surprise to me that The
Lord of the Rings was voted the nation’s best-loved novel in the BBC’s Big Read ten
years ago. This is a work that speaks to the perennial wonder that many of us
feel about the natural world, and the need to be part of something older and
grander than the world we can see around us. It is not an easy book to read,
especially if you like your fiction fast-paced and concise, but it is so
bursting with imagination and love of the land that it will always be at the
top of my list of both favorites and books that I would encourage everyone to
attempt. Yes, it is very light on female protagonists, but it comes from a
young man’s experiences of total war and the terrible grief and despair of
losing almost all his friends in the trenches. He himself would most likely
have been killed as well if had not been invalided home due to repeated bouts
of trench foot. He was part of a generation that fought desperately to protect
their country by enduring the most hellish of conditions and the yearning for
peace and natural beauty that we see in Frodo and Sam speaks to me on the
deepest of levels.
Not All Classics Are Equal
Perhaps the most important thing to remember about any book is that we all have different, personal reactions to it. There are some Classics that I simply do not 'get': I can appreciate much of their literary value, but I do not love them as so many other people do. Let me give you three examples, all of which are very highly rated in any list of Popular Classics, including the one on Goodreads.
Firstly, there is Jane Eyre by Charlotte Bronte. I was thoroughly enjoying this novel, even though Jane is a bit of a wet blanket, right up until Mr Rochester's attempted bigamy was exposed and it was revealed that he had his mad wife locked in the attic. I know that many people find him a tragically romantic figure, but at that point he lost all of my respect and sympathy. I had a similar reaction to the characters of Cathy and Heathcliffe in Emily Bronte's Wuthering Heights. They are possibly the most horribly toxic pair ever to grace the written page, in my opinion, and I simply cannot understand how any woman would want the abusive bully Heathcliffe to come anywhere near her. Finally, there is The Lord of the Flies by William Golding, which I first read at school. Even then, I was totally unsurprised by the savagery of the boys and their descent into a more primitive state of society. Instead if seeing this as a shocking depiction of what might just happen, it all seemed blindingly obvious to me and I was left wondering what all the fuss was about.
I know that I am in a minority in my opinions of these three Classics and I am not trying to argue that they do not belong on the list or that you should never read them: I am simply pointing out that not all Classics are enjoyable to every reader. My husband has tried numerous times to attempt James Joyce's Ulysses, which is acknowledged as a modern masterpiece, and yet he has never been able to get past page 20 without falling asleep. So, pick a classic author and give them a try: if you do not like them, there are plenty of others to chose from!
I agree. At first I thought Classics was going to be a rather boring discussion, but the more I read of what people have to say, the more engaged I become.Usually i think of a classic as something that is really old, perhaps difficult and likely boring. But I like the Goodreads definition you quoted. They are books that have stood the test of time.
ReplyDeleteHave a great Armchair BEA.
I was genuinely surprised by some of the books on the Goodreads list, but I guess it goes to show that there is still great literature being produced and that it isn't a lost art! :)
DeleteI think the word "Classics" causes many of our problems of perception. The word is turgid, intimidating. While Classic literature is often very much not. Hence another good reason to be active in the book blogging community :0)
ReplyDeleteI know; it is so great to see people like J.K.Rowling being acknowledged among the past greats: literature doesn't have to give you brain ache to be good! :D
DeleteMy favorite classics are the Russians--Dostoevsky, Lermontov, Pushkin, etc. At the same time, I just can't get Tolstoy. Ever since I read his short story "Family Happiness," I've thought of him as a chauvinistic prick.
ReplyDeleteI haven't tried any Russian authors so far, but there are several on my rather extensive TBR list! :D
DeleteI always wonder how much difference the various translators effect our perception of authors who write in other languages. I know that the translations of works like The Odyssey are very diverse and almost seem to be based upon different texts, so it is always something that worries me if I struggle with disliking a book in translation.
Translators do make a difference. When buying a book in translation, I tend to go to a bookstore and compare several and then pick the one I like most. Alternately, with e-books you can get a first chapter Kindle sample.
DeleteI always give books that I am not certain about a quick check with the Amazon 'Click inside' or the Kindle samples: they have saved me from truly awful reading experiences!
DeleteI really need to read more Shakespeare! There are so much of his work that I have not even touched yet!
ReplyDeleteIt can be daunting, but well worth it, especially if you can get a filmed version to watch at the same time so that you get a better idea of what's going on.
Delete